Metal seated butterfly valve are recommended to use in higher pressure rating like #300 and more rather than PTFE seated valve .PTFE seated valves are designed for using in chemical industry and for low pressure rating and non critical applications and they are designed for class IV leakage only i..e permissible leakage as per API 598 were as metal seated valves are designed and destined to use for higher temperature ,critical application like – hydrocarbon, Sulphur fumes, steam, gases – nitrogen, oxygen, argon etc and they give stringent class VI leakage and highly preferred or can say are only recommend to use for refineries, petrochemical ,terminals , LNG,LPG etc.
As described and explained in previous mail also PTFE seat valves are meant for low pressure rating and non-critical applications mainly for chemical , water sector as they have leakage class IV and this amount of leakage is permitted in these non-critical sector and loss is also economical whereas metal seated valves are used for critical application and higher ratings from #150 and above were leakage rate is nonnegotiable and require only zero leakage to avoid expensive leakage loss and reaction of hazardous medium with the environment.
So, as per our above discussion we request you to only use metal seated valves only for the Oil & Gas projects and this is not recommendation it is a requirement.
varun blog
Saturday, March 12, 2022
IMPORTANCE OF USING METAL SEATED BUTTERFLY VALVE IN HIGHER RATINGS
HYDRO TESTING OF VALVE AS PER API 598
HYDRO TESTING OF VALVE AS PER API 598
API 598 states that the hydro test pressure maximum is determined using yield strength.
- For body shall test pressure shall be 1.5 times the pressure rating .
- Where as for Disc seat Hydro test will be 1.1 times of the pressure rating.
In Oil & Gas sector valves need to be tested as per API 598 standard only to be suitable for the stringent requirement in refinery sector.
Testing valves at different
pressure rating as per API 598 is as follows:-
Rating |
Design pressure as per rating |
Shell test pressure |
Seat Test Pressure |
PN10 |
10 bar |
15 bar |
11 bar |
PN16 |
16 bar |
24 bar |
17.6 bar |
#150 |
21 bar |
32 bar |
23 bar |
#300 |
52 bar |
78 bar |
57.2 bar |
#600 |
104 bar |
156 bar |
114.4 bar |
#900 |
150 bar |
22 5 bar |
165 bar |
- Shall test pressure on
Body
- Seat test pressure on Disc
As per the above table is was
understood that as the rating increase design pressure also increase hence the
shall test pressure and it is to be noted that soft seat will not sustain and
will break away in the high pressure and are successful till pressure rating of
#150 class only. As at #300 pressure rating i.e 52 bar design pressure
were the shall testing is required to be done at 78 bar which is itself a
very high pressure, soft seating even PTFE will break up so , it was found that
vendors to pass the valve, do shall testing at 1.1 times (i.e. 58 bar) on shall
test in place of 1.5 times (78 bar). Which is a very wrong practice and
could lead to catastrophic accident in refineries and petrochemicals as due to
sudden surge or break up valve disc seat will break up as soft seat is not
designed to sustain and perform at such a high pressure , they are suitable
only for normal pressure and medium like water mostly.
We are attaching the API 598 Table 2 & 3 illustrating the shall test and seat test pressure mark ups on the design pressure for your kind pursual and reference .
We hope our above given justification will fulfill your requirement and will able you to take a right decision in betterment of project.
Tuesday, November 16, 2021
Advantage of Long Pattern Design ROSOV over Short Pattern ROSOV in Tankage
Difference between Long pattern & short Pattern ROSOV
- In petrochemical industry in tankages & terminals all designs are govern by API standards and flanges of valve are design as per API 600 standard ( which is a gate valve standard also )and it is to note that Long pattern of butterfly which is having same face to face of gate valve , its flanges are also design as per API 600 standard and during commissioning of valves for mating tank nozzle flanges which are also design as per API 600 standard there is a compatibility of mating both valve and nozzle flange of tank to assemble them with buts & bolts. Whereas short pattern flanges of Butterfly valves are design as per ISO standard and there is a compatibility issue in mating with the Nozzle flange of tank. Due to which there will be play in both flange mating resultant leakage of hydrocarbon which is very hazardous.
- Also to note ,ROSOV are required for emergency closing of tank with a very less or minimum closing time of less than 5 to 3 second and due to quick closing there will be high surge in amount of pressure is exert on the valve disc ( this pressure which is total of pipe pressure and gravitational pressure which will exert more due to hight of tank as tank height which could be around 9 meter). Due to certain surge in pressure on disc which has to be evenly distribute to the body of valve by the disc , long pattern body & disc will sustain such surge in pressure as due to long pattern body there will be pressure drop from the high surge decrease to normal were as there could be breakage in disc in short pattern as here valve body is smaller and could not sustain such high pressure and disc has to absorb such high pressure and many times causes breakaways which could be very hazadours.
- It is being observed there is a seating issue in short pattern as compare to long pattern valve because after certain time due to wear and tear and impingement effect seat would not be proper amalgamation of seat and seal resultant leakage in valve after some time were as such issue is not observed in long pattern as long pattern body will nullify the impingement effect and valve will give zero leakage for the very long service life.
- Also to note due to emergency closing there is a hammering effect in short pattern valve as due to backward surge in flow pressure which causes due to flowing in back ward direction by fluid due to quick closing as there will will be less space for the fluid to flow and will flow back. Were as long pattern design nullify such hammering effect as their will be pressure drop in fluid flow due to long pattern as fluid has to cover more distance resultant pressure drop.
Looking at such above points it
is highly recommended to use long pattern in comparison to short pattern
specially at the tank nozzle and aloo the tankage using companies -IOCL ,BPCL
,HCPL are using long pattern design only.